On Wednesday Finance Minister Audley Shaw
made it official. Government of Jamaica will be entering a borrowing relationship with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) this year. Jamaica has had a long and troubled history with the multilateral agency, and the even the every mention of the IMF conjures up negative images and memories. I can remember former Prime Minister, P.J. Patterson in a celebratory mood when he announced Jamaica's departure from the IMF as a borrowing member, waving a handkerchief and saying "Ta-Taa IMF"(a bit a political theater he performed two years in a row at consecutive PNP conferences). Though we waved the IMF goodbye, we were still left with the conditions and policies which lead us to the IMF in the first place. So here we are fourteen years later back with our friends from Washington D.C..
Minister Shaw's announcement, has resulted in a deluge of articles about the IMF in this Sunday's (7/26) major newspapers. Seems like everyone has something to say about it. Yes, I did read them all and yes, I need to get a life and find something better to do with my Sunday afternoon.
Here's the breakdown:
Claude Clarke thinks returning to the IMF
could be a good thing. He argues that the IMF could finally force the government to make well needed adjustments in economic policy. Policies which the JLP administration continued seamlessly after taking power in 2007.
Martin Henry argues that Jamaica's economic problems cannot be
blamed on its past relationship with the IMF or the current global economic crisis. He suggests that the Jamaican economy has been in recession for a generation, and has become even more indebted since leaving the IMF.
Gender and Development Consultant,
Dr. Glenda Simms,
implores the government not to allow women and girls to bear the brunt of the economic downturn, as they always do.
Dennis Morrison speaks about the impact of
the decline in tourism as a driving force behind Caribbean countries going to the IMF.
Ian Boyne firmly states that there is
no other option at this time but to go to the IMF, and those who suggest otherwise are living in a fantasy world. Boyne suggests that there is no way to recover the revenue lost this year and IMF funding would also open up access to other multilateral sources of funding as a result of IMF 'seal of approval.'
Robert Buddan reports on the various alternative to the IMF that were presented at a recent PNP economic forum.
Former Financial Secretary
Colin Bullock solidly reinforces 'in the box' thinking in
a depressing, fatalistic article about economic policy. He presents a rationale for why we cannot make helpful policy changes, such as reducing interest rates or implementing tax reforms, all while admitting how destructive these policies have been! This guy was the chief economic policy civil servant in the government? Yikes!
Don Robotham is
not a fan of the IMF or the prevailing market fundamentalism that dominates neo-liberal economics. He argues that the government should ensure that the poor is provided for while negotiating with the IMF and not simply accept destructive IMF conditionalities, which usually requires drastic cost cutting.
Claude Robinson:
raises the relevant issues about the implications of a new IMF agreement on the general public.
John Maxwell thinks that the
IMF is an evil, racist organization who's sole purpose is to destroy Third World countries.